Management Styles: How to Choose the Right One For Your Team?

Management Styles How to Choose the Right One For Your Team

Five popular types of management styles

1. Autocratic management style

Some leaders like to take on directive leadership styles, where the leader is firmly in charge, and it’s their way or the highway. This autocratic management style often means that employees need to follow instructions without any further negotiation or input. 

It’s a top-down approach that can work well when making decisions under tight timelines; unfortunately, employees with creative solutions might not have the opportunity to offer them. If this directive approach is combined with consistent communication and clear expectations, however, it absolutely can be an effective way of getting things done quickly and effectively.

2. Consultative management style 

Consultative management is the hot new trend in corporate leadership, where managers favor collaboration over dictation. That means instead of always having the last word, the manager seeks out input from employees before making big decisions. This not only encourages employee engagement but also shows that your employees are valued for their creativity and expertise in their field. 

The bottom line: consultative management is a great way to boost morale (and consequently, productivity) while harnessing the wisdom of your team – it’s a win-win!

3. Democratic management style

The democratic management style is gaining more popularity than ever before! With directive leadership, a thing of the past, businesses around the globe are seeing real results with a democratic approach. 

Empowering employees and taking their opinions into account to make decisions allows everyone in the organization to feel truly valued. It’s no wonder that democratic management styles can help create a more collaborative culture and an additional sense of belonging among team members! What’s not to love?

4. Laissez-faire management style

Adopting the laissez-faire management style is like a manager giving their employees free rein – they’re in charge, and they make the decisions! It can be incredibly liberating for those who find themselves bogged down by micromanaging bosses. With this style, workers are empowered to take ownership of their work and express themselves through it. 

Sure, there’s more risk involved here since the team isn’t being directly supervised, but rewards can come in bounty when employees feel enabled to innovate. Plus, it creates an ecosystem of trust where everyone knows exactly what is expected of them. So go forth and unleash your workforce – you won’t regret it!

5. Bureaucratic management style

The bureaucratic management style has been around for a long time, and it has its pros and cons. But one thing is for sure, if you have ever worked with somebody who uses the bureaucratic management style, then you know that there is often a lot of paperwork involved! 

Sure, sometimes it’s a hassle to fill out forms or obtain approvals before taking any action, but having those processes in place can help ensure that the right people are involved in decision-making and create consistency throughout an organization. Plus some red tape can be an entertaining diversion from more routine tasks. All in all, a good bureaucracy will improve how efficiently and effectively teams work together!

How to choose the right management style for your team

Trying to find the right management style for you and your team can be a tricky business. But, it doesn’t have to be so mysterious and intimidating! 

Instead, take some time to evaluate what individuals within your team need to succeed and create a plan of action from there. What works for one team may not work for another, so familiarity with the members and their individual needs is vital. 

What’s important is that your leadership style encourages collaboration and encourages everyone involved to put their skills together and become an even stronger team. Have a little fun while tackling this challenge – experiment with a few different styles and find out which one fits best!


So there you have it, a quick overview of the four main management styles. Hopefully, this has given you a better understanding of which style might work best for your team. If you still need to figure it out, try out each style for a week and see how it goes. At the end of the day, the most important thing is that you find what works best for you and your team. Thanks for reading!

Feel free to contact LeaderTrip Coaching for a complimentary discovery session.

Related Posts

When Power Corrupts: Understanding the Impact of Psychopathic Leaders

When we think about successful leaders, the words “charismatic”, “compassionate” and “responsible” usually come to mind. Unfortunately, when examining some of history’s most famous and influential figures, it becomes clear that a surprisingly high number display signs of psychopathy; a disorder characterized by dangerous impulsivity paired with an insatiable appetite for money, power and control over others.

Become a Leader With These 5 Competencies Proven By Leaders Around the World

What makes a great leader? To answer this question, we’ve interviewed leaders across the world to determine which leadership competencies are the most important.

The Innovative Strategies of Steve Jobs: A Revolutionary Leader

In this blog post, we’ll explore how Jobs’ leadership style applied in both successes and failures can help shape our own decisions as entrepreneurs today. Whether you’re just starting out on your entrepreneurial journey or have years of experience under your belt already, there’s something powerful to be gleaned in studying his career arc – let’s dive in.

8 Leadership Transformations to Help You Lead More Effectively

A great leader is someone who can adapt to any situation. They are able to navigate through difficult times and lead their team to success. However, being a great leader is not something that comes naturally to everyone.
About Us
LeaderTrip Coaching company logo
Get in touch with Sven

Let’s Socialize